HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory17.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160602
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 15:10
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 76
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 213
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 525
55% 443 Pts
64-Core 529
33% 529 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8053) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.6
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.2
6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 82 123 126 118 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
44.4% Average
Read 407
Write 330
Mixed 295
SusWrite 124
64% 289 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 13.2
52% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 90.8
DQ Mixed 43.6
50% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 189 188 191 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 148
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 190
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 13.6
36% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 41%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback