HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory15.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20160602
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 00:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 160
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 433
46% 370 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8053) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.76% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 6
4% 5.87 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 8.6
5% 6.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.76%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$53
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 58 80 107 94 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 325
Write 278
Mixed 232
SusWrite 76.2
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 11.4
39% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 55.3
DQ Mixed 42.5
43% 71.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 188 191 180 185 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 147
Mixed 71.6
SusWrite 187
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
35.4% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 12.3
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback