HP 870-212nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 870-212nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161110
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 10:30
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 85%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 46.6
2-Core 123
49% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 188
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50% Average
Lighting 61.2
Reflection 63.8
Parallax 57.3
50% 60.8 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 64
Splatting 59.3
50% 61.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 7.2 7.9 7.5 106 216 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
373GB free
Firmware: HPH3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 176 185 183 186 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 103
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 182
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 77 78 78 77 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 127
Write 142
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 78.4
130% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFRA266.C16FG Kingston HP24D4U7S8MBP-8 16GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.4% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 18.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 15.7
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870-212nf Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: HP 870-212nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback