Asus ET2020I

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus ET2020I  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK ET2020I
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 31 '23 at 19:18
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 80.3
2-Core 142
58% 97.9 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 155
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 127
8% 127 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Asus(1043 2111) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.35% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.8 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.35%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1116A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 22 21 18 18 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
38GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 32 28 29 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 132
Write 55.9
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 34.5
78% 68 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.5
137% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.9
26% 9.03 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.2
14% 5.03 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET2020I Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ET2020I

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $168
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback