Acer Aspire V3-575G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-575G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Usopp_SL
Memory7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151127
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '19 at 06:15
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.2% Above average
Memory 68.6
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 122
50% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 178
25% 183 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Acer(1025 1031) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1881
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.6
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 10.6
11% 11.4 fps
MRender 5.95
Gravity 13.1
Splatting 10
8% 9.69 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 15 39 49 52 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 2.5
Write 1.8
Mixed 3
SusWrite 38.1
8% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
11% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KNG/8G Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
42.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 14.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.6
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-575G Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-575G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback