Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 16.2 1-Core 45.7 2-Core 76.8 24% 46.2 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 161 20% 150 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 80E5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4542 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	1.61% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 15.7 Parallax 1.9 2% 6.47 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.61% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GB 4,074 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: X3511006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 144 168 189 172 188 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.4% Poor	Read 221 Write 238 Mixed 155 SusWrite 161 44% 193 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 6.3 22% 6.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 92%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$39 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 15 17 19 17 19 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB 77,702 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.6 14% 4.77 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 2.3 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 350 11% 350 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	564x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	327x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	288x

SSD
SD7SN6S-256G-1006 256GBSandiskBench 74%, 4,074 samples	72x
MZNTE256HMHP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 65%, 1,776 samples	59x
L8H-256V2G-HP 256GBLiteonBench 74%, 4,213 samples	54x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	167x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples	152x
K4E6E304EE-EGCE 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,168 samples	73x