Asrock N68C-S UCC

Performance Results

Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop 48%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-S UCC  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '23 at 13:21
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 850
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 73.5
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 99.7
47% 74.3 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 175
24% 180 Pts
64-Core 172
11% 172 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 3.7
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.1
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
173GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 163 150 27 78 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.8% Very poor
Read 172
Write 137
Mixed 147
SusWrite 109
32% 141 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
20% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate ST9160310AS 160GB-$36
148GB free
Firmware: 0303
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 56.1
Mixed 36.3
SusWrite 62.2
39% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 38%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
46GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 14 13 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 56.1
Write 14.2
Mixed 16.5
SusWrite 14.1
27% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 7.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 24%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 50 7.2" 1280 720 SAM069B SAMSUNG
Typical N68C-S UCC Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-S UCC

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback