Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DRD-iF/LF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180910
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 16:23
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 153
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 587
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 2,236
138% 2,236 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.2
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 169 111 169 106 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 368
Write 210
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 153
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 28.6
4K Mixed 10.7
63% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 0.3
26% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 145%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
904GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 173 170 171 172 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 175
Mixed 134
SusWrite 170
123% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.3
251% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-113.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 21.5
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 5.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRD-iF/LF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback