Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DRD-iF/LF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 22:53
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Memory 54.9
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 157
54% 97.6 Pts
4-Core 296
8-Core 587
52% 442 Pts
64-Core 2,234
138% 2,234 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 4.2
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 325 333 335 334 179 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 427
Write 334
Mixed 340
SusWrite 308
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 12.9
76% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 81.7
DQ Mixed 30.4
41% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 145%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
904GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 170 172 171 171 164 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 180
Mixed 109
SusWrite 170
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.3
253% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-113.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 19.8
69% 24 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 5.7
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRD-iF/LF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback