Asus KGP(M)E-D16

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus KGP(M)E-D16 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK KGP(M)E-D16
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160616
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '21 at 04:58
Run Duration	274 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Opteron 6320 15 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Memory 74.8 1-Core 53.5 2-Core 107 49% 78.4 Pts	4-Core 184 8-Core 255 28% 219 Pts	64-Core 304 19% 304 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 1596) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.6% Average	Lighting 52.3 Reflection 55.2 Parallax 51.3 43% 52.9 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 49.1 Splatting 45.7 42% 53 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 23GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 43 49 40 55 40 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.2% Below average	Read 188 Write 47.6 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 44.7 19% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 15.3 4K Write 42.5 4K Mixed 16.9 67% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 289 DQ Write 48.8 DQ Mixed 48.9 67% 129 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 38.2% Great: 85%
WDC WD82PURZ-85TEUY0 8TB 331 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 7.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 67 67 66 66 67 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 179 Write 154 Mixed 93.6 SusWrite 65.4 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 1.9 9% 4 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 4.8 DQ Mixed 1.9 2% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 29%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 58GB free Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 204 175 180 150 141 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 379 Write 162 Mixed 147 SusWrite 174 48% 216 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 43.6 4K Mixed 19.6 78% 27.5 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 50 80% 159 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 67 67 66 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 137 Write 136 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 65.1 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 89 90 90 90 91 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 133 Write 109 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 87 71% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 187% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 914GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 89 89 90 90 91 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Read 123 Write 105 Mixed 83.2 SusWrite 86.8 74% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 76%
H/W RAID10 4TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0957 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 4.1 3.5 19 0 3.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 149 Write 107 Mixed 77.6 SusWrite 13.3 64% 86.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 232% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9965516-113.A00LF 4x8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38% Below average	MC Read 11.4 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 15.8 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 11.2 23% 8.1 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical KGP(M)E-D16 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus KGP(M)E-D16

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16