Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory26.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 08:14
Run Duration338 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.5
1-Core 152
2-Core 295
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 549
8-Core 842
86% 696 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57% Above average
Lighting 69.8
Reflection 78.1
Parallax 70.1
57% 72.7 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 71.5
57% 69.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,538
Write 2,065
Mixed 1,625
460% 2076 MB/s
4K Read 65.2
4K Write 158
4K Mixed 87.7
295% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,378
DQ Write 1,110
DQ Mixed 1,229
924% 1,239 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
WDC WD82PURZ-85TEUY0 8TB
267GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 120 120 127 124 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 145
Write 146
Mixed 96.3
SusWrite 122
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1.8
10% 4.63 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 4.8
DQ Mixed 2.1
2% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 29%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 139 140 140 140 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 147
Write 136
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 138
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 97%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
218GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 105 107 107 110 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 97%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 146 148 147 149 145 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 97%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB-$71
1TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 103 105 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 104
Write 104
Mixed 57
SusWrite 105
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 69%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
698GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 60 60 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 60.1
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 59.5
46% 61.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 83%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170
4TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 163 160 160 159 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 103
Mixed 103
SusWrite 159
100% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 97%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
227GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 85 84 86 87 87 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 149
Write 148
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 84.8
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
337GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 84 85 85 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 124
Write 112
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 85.8
73% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40.3
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 33.8
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 45
SC Mixed 32
96% 33.5 GB/s
Latency 58.6
68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 111%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 3R 6G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 22% 65 310 228 144 26.9" 2560 1440 ACR0692 ED273UR
Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $953
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback