Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemSupermicro X9DRD-iF/LF  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X9DRD-iF
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 20:37
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2695 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 82
2-Core 159
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 589
52% 440 Pts
64-Core 2285
141% 2285 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.03 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ortial SSD 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 328 329 337 336 329 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 426
Write 336
Mixed 344
SusWrite 333
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 12.7
72% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 31.4
42% 76.2 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 145%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
912GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 171 172 171 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 161
Mixed 131
SusWrite 170
118% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965516-113.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X9DRD-iF/LF Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro X9DRD-iF/LF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback