Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics72.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemCyberpowerpc C SERIES  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B360M Xtreme
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '23 at 14:38
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 91.2
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 705
74% 593 Pts
64-Core 707
44% 707 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.4% Very good
Lighting 96.3
Reflection 91
Parallax 84.6
78% 90.6 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 81.3
Splatting 73.5
60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$58
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 24 117 18 79 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 446
Write 366
Mixed 242
SusWrite 83.7
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 18.6
66% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 82.2
DQ Mixed 44.4
48% 80.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 55%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 512G 512GB
428GB free
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 0.7 41 16 1.2 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 269
Write 53.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 18.2
20% 92 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 15.9
4K Mixed 2.2
53% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 1.4
DQ Mixed 0.1
16% 41.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
365GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 140 140 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 134
Mixed 103
SusWrite 141
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G9EVUF 1TB
326GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 57 58 58 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 41.5
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 57.7
31% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 37%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
60GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42% Average
Read 75
Write 70.2
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 70.8
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G956GF 1TB
381GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 76 74 74 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 54
Write 60
Mixed 40
SusWrite 75.2
42% 57.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 38%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
234GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 83 82 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 69
Write 68.2
Mixed 55
SusWrite 82.9
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 74%
Hitachi HUA7210SASUN1.0T 0802G7TV0F 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: GKAOA90A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 80 81 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 80
Write 80
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 81.5
53% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 28.7
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.2
SC Mixed 26.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C SERIES Builds (Compare 4,611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: Cyberpowerpc C SERIES

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback