F-plus FLAPTOP i

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemF-plus FLAPTOP i  (all builds)
MotherboardF-Plus f+ FLAPTOP I-SERIES
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 18:19
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
79.1% Very good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 162
2-Core 260
89% 163 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 715
74% 598 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 11.7
Reflection 17.6
Parallax 13.4
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 16.9
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 14.6
15% 18.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F512G 512GB
444GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 1650 1438 2052 2041 2064 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 989
Write 1,550
Mixed 874
SusWrite 1,753
294% 1,291 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 32.6
112% 38.2 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 560
DQ Mixed 86
241% 524 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 214%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200CQGMZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 16.7
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FLAPTOP i Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: F-plus FLAPTOP i

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback