Tecno MEGABOOK T15DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemTecno MEGABOOK T15DA  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault MEGABOOK T15DA
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 20:37
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5560U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 43.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 192
63% 117 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 649
59% 496 Pts
64-Core 798
49% 798 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.9.2
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.35% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 20.5
5% 12.5 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 16.2
13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.35%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F512G 512GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.28
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2067 2085 2039 2077 2154 2146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 1,935
Write 2335
Mixed 1,724
SusWrite 2,095
457% 2,022 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 62.9
233% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 934
DQ Write 705
DQ Mixed 119
279% 586 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 313%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H54G56CYRBX247 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 28.6
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 27.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E8
Typical MEGABOOK T15DA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Tecno MEGABOOK T15DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback