Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics166% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 21:28
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 29%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 94.8
1-Core 137
2-Core 282
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 929
90% 737 Pts
64-Core 1,482
92% 1,482 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 213
Parallax 269
184% 236 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 223
Splatting 176
178% 223 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 166%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1175 1446 1601 1511 1492 1470 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,012
Write 1,974
Mixed 1,585
SusWrite 1,449
395% 1,755 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 62.6
203% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 871
638% 840 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 269%
Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
667GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 388 439 444 445 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 423
Mixed 401
SusWrite 411
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 46.9
149% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 227
164% 214 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 125%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 440 443 443 445 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 461
Write 420
Mixed 389
SusWrite 444
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 23.1
111% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 80.8
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 27.2
47% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 100%
Ssa2s120gc2de08-t A 120GB
12GB free
Firmware: 334ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 135 139 137 138 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Read 407
Write 151
Mixed 202
SusWrite 134
49% 224 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 35.1
136% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 123
105% 155 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 82%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 118GB
110GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 211 211 211 211 210 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 454
Write 165
Mixed 192
SusWrite 211
56% 255 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 15.5
92% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 170
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 80.6
89% 150 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
29GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 230
Write 93.7
Mixed 87.9
148% 137 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 8.1
694% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 8.1
705% 10.3 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 38
MC Mixed 24.9
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 28.3
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 57.8
69% 57.8 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback