Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 158%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 155%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF  (all builds)
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 21:11
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 137
2-Core 280
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 531
8-Core 914
88% 723 Pts
64-Core 1,447
90% 1,447 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
MSI(1462 3710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 229
Reflection 213
Parallax 269
186% 237 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 225
Splatting 179
179% 225 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 167%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
673GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1199 1413 1640 1659 1587 1452 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
281% Outstanding
Read 2,227
Write 1,969
Mixed 1,578
SusWrite 1,492
408% 1,816 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 63.4
205% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 873
641% 847 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 281%
Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
667GB free
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 383 434 440 444 444 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 476
Write 421
Mixed 384
SusWrite 409
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 42.2
138% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 151
133% 197 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 125%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
420GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 439 443 441 439 445 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 446
Write 419
Mixed 389
SusWrite 443
96% 424 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 21.8
111% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 134
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 36.1
70% 136 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 86%
Great: 100%
Ssa2s120gc2de08-t A 120GB
12GB free
Firmware: 334ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 136 136 136 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 382
Write 148
Mixed 195
SusWrite 131
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 34.4
132% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 156
119% 162 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 82%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 118GB
110GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 208 211 210 210 208 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 450
Write 207
Mixed 196
SusWrite 210
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 15.9
92% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 79.4
94% 162 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28
29GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 228
Write 92.6
Mixed 88.3
147% 136 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 8.1
690% 10.3 MB/s
DQ Read 11.3
DQ Write 11.2
DQ Mixed 8
695% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74% Very good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 20.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 24.2
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,867 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $867
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback