Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 153% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 155% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	282% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191015
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '23 at 21:02
Run Duration	268 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Memory 89.6 1-Core 142 2-Core 275 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 532 8-Core 973 90% 753 Pts	64-Core 1,514 94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% MSI(1462 3710) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	164% Outstanding	Lighting 223 Reflection 210 Parallax 245 182% 226 fps	MRender 266 Gravity 221 Splatting 177 176% 221 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$76 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 673GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 1465 1674 1612 1592 1437 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	282% Outstanding	Read 2,229 Write 2,017 Mixed 1,611 SusWrite 1486 412% 1,836 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 94.5 4K Mixed 62 204% 68.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1009 DQ Write 714 DQ Mixed 894 659% 872 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 282% Great: 410%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 667GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 387 434 441 444 443 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 492 Write 455 Mixed 426 SusWrite 408 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 82.1 4K Mixed 47.2 153% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 296 240% 340 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 125%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB 46,239 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 420GB free Firmware: M6CR030 SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 445 446 447 429 449 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 483 Write 404 Mixed 407 SusWrite 444 98% 434 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 23.6 115% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 36.7 87% 176 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 100%
Ssa2s120gc2de08-t A 120GB 92 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 12GB free Firmware: 334ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 140 137 137 137 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 425 Write 152 Mixed 205 SusWrite 132 50% 229 MB/s	4K Read 31.3 4K Write 82.5 4K Mixed 35.9 137% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 185 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 161 122% 166 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 82%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 118GB 1,345 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 110GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 210 211 210 208 210 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 460 Write 210 Mixed 203 SusWrite 208 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 84.1 4K Mixed 16.7 100% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 82.8 96% 164 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 97%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 32GB-$28 4,213 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 29GB free, PID 5580 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 242 Write 96.8 Mixed 87.9 152% 142 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 8.1 688% 10.4 MB/s	DQ Read 11.3 DQ Write 11.5 DQ Mixed 8.3 715% 10.4 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4400 C19 2x16GB 699 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 22.5 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 20.7 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 37.5 SC Mixed 26.7 79% 27.6 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 133%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,814 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $245Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,873x
Core i9-9900KIntel $405Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,720x
Core i5-9600KIntel $136Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,086x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	485x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	457x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	379x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	229x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	208x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $866

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16