Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 19 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 13 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago, 5 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS/BR (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161227
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '23 at 23:59
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 196 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 348 47% 348 Pts	64-Core 333 21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% EVGA(3842 6152) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Lighting 33.2 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 33.4 27% 34 fps	MRender 38.1 Gravity 34.4 Splatting 24.1 26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 49 42 3.9 74 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 364 Write 62.3 Mixed 303 SusWrite 50.4 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 58.8 4K Mixed 24.3 98% 35.5 MB/s	DQ Read 232 DQ Write 74.8 DQ Mixed 39.8 59% 115 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 505GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 145 142 145 140 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 154 Write 126 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 143 93% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FBD BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBR2 16GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.1% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 30.7 MC Mixed 23.9 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 31.7 SC Mixed 22.7 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 78.1 51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 78%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	255x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	100x
Core i3-7100Intel $38Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	19x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369