Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-CS/BR  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 03:21
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
67.8% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 99.3
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 309
41% 309 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 35.4
Parallax 33.5
27% 34.1 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 34.5
Splatting 24
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 7 163 2.8 48 52 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 445
Write 338
Mixed 307
SusWrite 56
64% 286 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 24.8
104% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 165
152% 232 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
536GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 193 195 197 194 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 151
Mixed 85.6
SusWrite 194
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSCK.8FBD BLS8G4D26BFSE.16FBR2 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
76.3% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.2
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.3
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 667 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $215
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback