TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B450M H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M H  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 18:01
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$123
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.4% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 162
2-Core 320
103% 191 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 909
93% 750 Pts
64-Core 1,068
66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 84% ↑
This bench: 99.4%
 Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Nvidia(10DE 1033) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 39.2
Reflection 37.4
Parallax 50.4
32% 42.3 fps
MRender 52.5
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 38.2
37% 46.2 fps
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 33.7%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S400 240GB
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 89 71 72 72 68 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 374
Write 434
Mixed 424
SusWrite 114
76% 336 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 98.3
4K Mixed 31.1
148% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 47.4
99% 197 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 78%
 Great: 96%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
154GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 73.7
Write 74.6
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 96.6
55% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑
This bench: 48.9%
 Great: 65%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25
226GB free
Firmware: 18.01H18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 79 77 65 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 78.8
Write 80.7
Mixed 57
SusWrite 75.3
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑
This bench: 44.3%
 Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 30.7
89% 31.1 GB/s
SC Read 28.6
SC Write 44
SC Mixed 32.3
100% 35 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 65% ↑
This bench: 91.1%
 Great: 111%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450M H Builds (Compare 1,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M H

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples319x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples156x
Ryzen 5 3500XAMD  $160Bench 82%, 33,544 samples128x
GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples114x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples98x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples88x
SSD
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples37x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples34x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples31x
RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples53x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples44x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples43x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback