Asus H110M-K X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics98.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110M-K X  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 00:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
61.8% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 190
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 321
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.2% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 114
Parallax 122
104% 121 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.2
88% 110 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 359 385 414 370 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 325
Write 377
Mixed 326
SusWrite 326
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 64.2
4K Mixed 43
138% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 159
174% 292 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 125%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 166 171 170 172 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 145
Write 143
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 162
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
180GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 121 125 122 123 121 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 138
Write 143
Mixed 86.1
SusWrite 121
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CRC Micron 4ATF51264AZ-2G3B1 20GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
70.7% Very good
MC Read 25
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 20.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K X Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback