Acer Predator PO9-600

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Acer Predator PO9-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	American Predator PO9-600
Memory	55 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190307
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 21 '22 at 14:25
Run Duration	437 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$192 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Memory 86.7 1-Core 130 2-Core 262 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 736 76% 614 Pts	64-Core 895 55% 895 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Sapphire(174B 1470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 156 Reflection 172 Parallax 170 127% 166 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 164 Splatting 119 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$119 20,782 User benchmarks, average bench 128% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: PSF109C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 552 363 118 239 381 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 840 Write 546 Mixed 645 SusWrite 296 130% 582 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 73.7 4K Mixed 39 132% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 504 DQ Write 525 DQ Mixed 468 365% 499 MB/s
Poor: 95% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 144%
Ocz-vert EX450 256GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 5GB free Firmware: 1.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 403 Write 360 Mixed 297 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 27.7 100% 35.8 MB/s	DQ Read 335 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 259 212% 303 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 103%
XPG SX95 0U 960GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 256GB free Firmware: Q092 SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 255 254 255 256 257 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 473 Write 390 Mixed 376 SusWrite 255 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 56.6 4K Mixed 33.7 111% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 200 160% 223 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 79%
XPG SX95 0U 960GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 125GB free Firmware: Q092 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 299 298 298 301 302 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 478 Write 388 Mixed 371 SusWrite 299 86% 384 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 31.7 109% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 266 DQ Mixed 256 187% 241 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 79%
XPG SX95 0U 960GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 73GB free Firmware: Q092 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 260 259 259 261 262 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 474 Write 388 Mixed 370 SusWrite 260 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 55.7 4K Mixed 33.8 110% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 265 DQ Mixed 256 188% 244 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 79%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$183 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 3GB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 21 21 20 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Read 16.3 Write 28.8 Mixed 26.3 SusWrite 22 17% 23.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.1 194% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 111%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$183 4,829 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01M03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 165 177 165 162 175 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	94.4% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 159 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 166 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.7 219% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 111%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$70 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 517GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 40.3 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 11.4 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 63%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 225GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 11 11 12 11 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 52.5 Write 35.5 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 11.5 24% 32.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 100%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 538GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 38 Write 40.2 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 11.3 23% 30.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 84%
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65 1,900 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	18.8% Very poor	Read 53.5 Write 36 Mixed 35.5 SusWrite 11.3 25% 34.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 18.8% Great: 83%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2GB free Firmware: 0107 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 375 Write 35.2 Mixed 50.8 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 105%
Seagate ST4000NE001-2MA101 4TB 145 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 187GB free Firmware: 0107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 128 131 130 131 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 33% Great: 105%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 19 19 17 18 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 36.2 Write 37 Mixed 29 SusWrite 17.9 40% 30 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 48%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 78GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 0.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 50 Write 35.2 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 0 34% 28.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 84% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 527GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.3 2.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 36.5 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 2.3 34% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 98% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 77 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 133GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 0 1.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 51 Write 35 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 0.2 35% 29 MB/s	4K Read 1.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 91% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 59%
WDC WD10 EALX-009BA0 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 71GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 36 Mixed 29.5 SusWrite 2.3 33% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 53%
WDC WD30 EFRX-68EUZN0 3TB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 252GB free, PID 2773 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 35.8 Write 36.2 Mixed 27 SusWrite 18.4 39% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 90% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9D8MH-16 4x16GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.2% Excellent	MC Read 30 MC Write 34.8 MC Mixed 27 87% 30.6 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 37.3 SC Mixed 26.3 78% 27.4 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO9-600 Builds (Compare 111 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 109%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 100%

Nuclear submarine

System: Acer Predator PO9-600

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $192Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	107x
Core i5-8400Intel $125Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	3x
Core i5-8600KIntel $139Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	40x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	20x
RTX 2080Nvidia $389Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x

SSD
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $119Bench 128%, 20,782 samples	20x
600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBIntel $49Bench 116%, 58,154 samples	20x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	9x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 687 samples	24x
ACR26D4U9S8MH-8 4x8GBKingstonBench 83%, 176 samples	13x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $796

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16