Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 76% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 88% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	78.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '20 at 08:09
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Memory 71.5 1-Core 156 2-Core 309 94% 179 Pts	4-Core 610 8-Core 1,176 106% 893 Pts	64-Core 2168 134% 2168 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 97%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400 91,676 User benchmarks, average bench 87% Asus(1043 04C4) CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	78.4% Very good	Lighting 92.8 Reflection 84.3 Parallax 136 76% 104 fps	MRender 85.3 Gravity 99.4 Splatting 116 84% 100 fps
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,394 Write 944 Mixed 407 201% 915 MB/s	4K Read 46.2 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 49.3 219% 85.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,022 DQ Write 974 DQ Mixed 807 658% 934 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 36GB free Firmware: 040H SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 178 178 188 187 187 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	66.3% Good	Read 455 Write 189 Mixed 225 SusWrite 184 58% 263 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 16.7 109% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 128 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 29.8 47% 89.7 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 72%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 139GB free Firmware: M3CR SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 468 467 468 469 469 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	118% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 467 Mixed 438 SusWrite 467 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 49.6 167% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 389 DQ Write 363 DQ Mixed 298 245% 350 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 125%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 678GB free Firmware: ST6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 85 85 86 85 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 95.7 Write 87.2 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 83.9 58% 79.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 61%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 210GB free Firmware: ST6O SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 68 68 68 67 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	40.5% Average	Read 74.5 Write 52.8 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 66.4 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 61%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00D8PB0 3TB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 113 114 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	49.2% Average	Read 115 Write 115 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 113 151% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 49.2% Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 785GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	22.1% Poor	Read 101 Write 101 Mixed 84.7 SusWrite 0.7 92% 71.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.1% Great: 56%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 112 114 113 114 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 122 Write 111 Mixed 83.5 SusWrite 113 144% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$55 215,644 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	77.8% Very good	MC Read 31 MC Write 27.6 MC Mixed 27.8 82% 28.8 GB/s	SC Read 20.1 SC Write 18 SC Mixed 24 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16