Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics7.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '22 at 06:12
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 61.8
2-Core 53.3
35% 53 Pts
4-Core 80.6
8-Core 76.1
11% 78.3 Pts
64-Core 80.1
5% 80.1 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
7.97% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 13.4
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 8.3
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 10
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.97%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC-WRSN 250GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 161 140 164 162 170 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.5% Average
Read 257
Write 248
Mixed 221
SusWrite 170
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 20
66% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 141
111% 156 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
425GB free
Firmware: SD14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 92 100 101 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
632GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 99 103 103 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 85.7
Write 101
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 101
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FJ CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.7% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8.7
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback