Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateSep 19 '22 at 08:36
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Memory 47
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 93.8
42% 70 Pts
4-Core 91
8-Core 91.7
12% 91.3 Pts
64-Core 98.9
6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 13.5
0% 8.17 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 10.1
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC-WRSN 250GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 168 157 167 174 179 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 379
Write 278
Mixed 175
SusWrite 170
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 25.4
98% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 166
131% 182 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
425GB free
Firmware: SD14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 101 98 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 59%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
642GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 103 104 103 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 90.6
Write 110
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 103
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FJ CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 9.5
20% 7.03 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 25%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback