Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-HD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170626
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 06:28
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
31.5% Below average
Memory 44.7
1-Core 71.2
2-Core 106
43% 74 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 95.9
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 108
7% 108 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.13% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 10.8
Parallax 14.8
8% 11.9 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 10.2
8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 8.13%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC-WRSN 250GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 175 175 161 159 166 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 389
Write 403
Mixed 210
SusWrite 170
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 34.9
118% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 185
150% 215 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
425GB free
Firmware: SD14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 88.5
Write 13.3
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 99.4
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750
649GB free
Firmware: CC3H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 106 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 101
Write 108
Mixed 59.9
SusWrite 105
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FJ CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.3% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 181
22% 181 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 199 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $136
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback