Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	8.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	75.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Gigabyte A320M-HD2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170626
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 14 '22 at 11:49
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	43%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9500 APU (2016 D.BR) 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 34% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 41.3 1-Core 71.5 2-Core 109 42% 73.8 Pts	4-Core 105 8-Core 109 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 102 6% 102 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 44%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 13,858 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	8.07% Terrible	Lighting 9.9 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 13.5 8% 11.4 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 10.6 Splatting 10.1 8% 9.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 8.07% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC-WRSN 250GB 1,412 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41110WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 174 175 159 170 137 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Read 410 Write 415 Mixed 244 SusWrite 168 69% 309 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 57.7 4K Mixed 36.8 125% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 196 DQ Mixed 188 151% 213 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 426GB free Firmware: SD14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 100 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 95.6 Write 95.4 Mixed 54 SusWrite 100 63% 86.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 59%
Seagate ST31000333AS 1TB-$750 12,067 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 653GB free Firmware: CC3H SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 103 105 106 105 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 113 Mixed 64 SusWrite 105 71% 96.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FJ CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBR1 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.3% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 11.3 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 196 20% 196 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320M-HD2-CF Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-HD2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples	37x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	23x
Ryzen 3 1300XAMD $102Bench 65%, 38,959 samples	21x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	26x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	18x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
A400 120GBKingston $26Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	10x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	9x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GBCorsair $25Bench 42%, 47,473 samples	6x
2666 C16 Series 2x4GBUnknownBench 77%, 3,759 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $227

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16