Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics74% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 15:46
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 152
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 592
53% 448 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Lighting 92.8
Reflection 90.1
Parallax 83.8
76% 88.9 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 72.2
71% 89.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 251 249 251 252 253 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 470
Mixed 402
SusWrite 250
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 56.5
4K Mixed 42.1
136% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 350
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 132%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
302GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 251 249 252 252 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 472
Mixed 411
SusWrite 251
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 42
137% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 347
263% 354 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 132%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
47GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 251 249 252 252 252 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 472
Mixed 454
SusWrite 251
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 42.1
135% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 353
266% 355 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
287GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 251 249 252 252 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 470
Mixed 410
SusWrite 251
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 43.4
140% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 348
263% 353 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 132%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
194GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 251 249 252 252 252 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 470
Mixed 409
SusWrite 251
91% 404 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 43.4
140% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 346
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 132%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
466GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1110 601 600 601 599 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,856
Write 1,498
Mixed 772
SusWrite 834
276% 1,240 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 47.2
156% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 567
DQ Mixed 586
447% 605 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 201%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 45.6
MC Mixed 36.7
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 17.1
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 108%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback