Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	72.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 18 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190710
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '22 at 23:08
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4 25 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	65.3% Good	Memory 74.6 1-Core 85 2-Core 165 63% 108 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 579 52% 440 Pts	64-Core 913 56% 913 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% MSI(1462 C758) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.86 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.1% Very good	Lighting 90.3 Reflection 88.4 Parallax 81.9 74% 86.9 fps	MRender 110 Gravity 79.6 Splatting 70.6 69% 86.9 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB 1,627 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 412GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV02L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 247 247 249 248 250 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 325 Mixed 381 SusWrite 248 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 56.9 4K Mixed 41.8 134% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 335 254% 341 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 132%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB 1,627 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 302GB free Firmware: MAV02L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 248 248 249 250 250 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 462 Mixed 395 SusWrite 248 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 57.5 4K Mixed 41.8 134% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 363 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 334 253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 132%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 47GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 248 247 248 249 250 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 485 Write 462 Mixed 436 SusWrite 248 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 40.6 131% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 340 256% 342 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB 1,627 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 287GB free Firmware: MAV02L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 248 247 248 249 249 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 463 Mixed 380 SusWrite 248 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 59 4K Mixed 41.8 136% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 365 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 334 253% 340 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 132%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB 1,627 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 194GB free Firmware: MAV02L6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 248 248 248 249 250 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 462 Mixed 386 SusWrite 248 88% 394 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 42.3 135% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 366 DQ Write 325 DQ Mixed 335 254% 342 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 132%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 466GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1436 1127 605 605 605 604 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1,769 Write 1,416 Mixed 834 SusWrite 830 270% 1,212 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 82.8 4K Mixed 46.9 158% 55 MB/s	DQ Read 618 DQ Write 513 DQ Mixed 533 408% 555 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 254%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB 10,297 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 46.2 MC Write 45.3 MC Mixed 36.2 122% 42.6 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 17 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 91.1 44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 106%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

CPU
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	306x
Core i7-6950XIntel $449Bench 87%, 6,135 samples	246x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	129x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	182x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	177x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	64x

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $330Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	47x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $105Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	37x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	36x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $60Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	20x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 96%, 3,140 samples	18x
Dominator DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 95%, 3,531 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $1,475

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369