Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 20:25
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2618L v4
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 81
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 158
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 603
55% 460 Pts
64-Core 953
59% 953 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.8% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 89
Parallax 82.8
74% 87.5 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 80.4
Splatting 72
71% 88.7 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 239 245 250 251 249 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 456
Mixed 372
SusWrite 246
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 43.6
140% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 344
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 132%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
302GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 243 247 250 251 251 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 467
Mixed 397
SusWrite 248
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 45.1
146% 48.2 MB/s
DQ Read 369
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 132%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
47GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 244 247 250 251 251 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 467
Mixed 452
SusWrite 248
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 44.3
143% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
287GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 243 247 250 251 250 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 469
Mixed 385
SusWrite 248
89% 398 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 63.7
4K Mixed 44
144% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 344
259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 132%
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
194GB free
Firmware: MAV02L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 243 247 250 251 251 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 441
Mixed 403
SusWrite 248
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 44.9
146% 48.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 346
260% 347 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 132%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
466GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1461 1134 605 606 606 603 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,833
Write 1,449
Mixed 848
SusWrite 836
277% 1,241 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 49.6
163% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 604
464% 632 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 204%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 47.4
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 36.1
122% 42.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 15.9
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 107%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EDITION 10 - $485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $1,475
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback