HP Workstation z820

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Workstation z820  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory59.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120309
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 18:16
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 97
2-Core 180
61% 111 Pts
4-Core 341
8-Core 682
60% 512 Pts
64-Core 1,692
105% 1,692 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 111
Parallax 102
90% 108 fps
MRender 94.9
Gravity 103
Splatting 99.4
81% 99.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 500GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 362 364 363 365 363 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 434
Write 362
Mixed 307
SusWrite 363
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 36.1
4K Mixed 23.3
84% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 204
165% 234 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 120%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
814GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 110 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 100
Write 94.6
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 110
67% 91.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 87%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 146 145 148 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 152
Write 152
Mixed 75
SusWrite 146
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 134 137 137 137 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 145
Write 150
Mixed 106
SusWrite 137
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 100%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
54GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 56
Write 14.2
Mixed 16.4
SusWrite 17.7
29% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
63% 5.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1778 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 52.4
MC Write 34.5
MC Mixed 29.9
111% 38.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Workstation z820 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Workstation z820

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback