HP Workstation z820

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Workstation z820  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory59.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120309
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 18:01
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 184
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 706
63% 534 Pts
64-Core 1700
105% 1700 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 114
Parallax 1.3
10% 42.9 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 102
56% 65.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 500GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 435 448 344 349 351 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 462
Mixed 451
SusWrite 394
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 44.6
144% 46.9 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 250
189% 255 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 101%
Great: 120%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$27
814GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 130 128 130 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 91.6
Write 98.5
Mixed 94.5
SusWrite 130
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 87%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 147 143 145 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 154
Write 148
Mixed 77
SusWrite 146
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$90
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 136 137 134 136 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 142
Mixed 111
SusWrite 136
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 100%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
54GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 17 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 60.9
Write 13.9
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 17.7
29% 27 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.6
116% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4C-RD 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1778 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.5% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 27.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.9
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Workstation z820 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Workstation z820

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback