Performance Results


Gaming 99% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 98% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display	3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '22 at 10:51
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$409 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 148 2-Core 278 97% 174 Pts	4-Core 497 8-Core 920 85% 709 Pts	64-Core 1,383 86% 1,383 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 867A) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 123 Reflection 110 Parallax 127 100% 120 fps	MRender 177 Gravity 122 Splatting 102 106% 134 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 371 311 317 319 309 311 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 464 Mixed 434 SusWrite 323 96% 424 MB/s	4K Read 31.7 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 40.3 131% 43.9 MB/s	DQ Read 311 DQ Write 256 DQ Mixed 292 216% 286 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 129%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 315GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 274 275 276 62 32 MB/s Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.1% Above average	Read 114 Write 215 Mixed 242 SusWrite 196 44% 192 MB/s	4K Read 18.9 4K Write 51.5 4K Mixed 25.1 88% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 91.8 102% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 102%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$99 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 35GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 116 100 101 117 98 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 90.4 Write 90.9 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 105 56% 76.8 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.8 168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2K4266C19 2x8GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4100 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	MC Read 39.5 MC Write 46.1 MC Mixed 29.2 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 50.6 SC Mixed 31.2 98% 34.3 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	216x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	188x
RTX 2060Nvidia $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	167x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	155x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	123x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $138Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	111x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	92x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	82x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	80x

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $877

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16