Asrock H61M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H61M  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110303
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 09:40
Run Duration865 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 54.1
2-Core 99.1
46% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 188
8-Core 187
25% 188 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
Zotac(19DA 1166) 768MB
CLim: 710 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 3.9
10% 11.6 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 13.1
13% 15.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 128GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0722A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 69 68 40 23 51 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.4% Poor
Read 213
Write 195
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 54.2
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 0.9
43% 15.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 16.8
22% 36.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
366GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 83.5
Write 89.2
Mixed 49
SusWrite 94.6
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 68%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
359GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 7.7
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 3
6% 7.97 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
238% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback