Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	90.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	2.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150618
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '22 at 05:27
Run Duration	284 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	66.4% Good	Memory 89.2 1-Core 92.7 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 296 35% 271 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8491) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.19% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 5.5 Parallax 1 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 5.4 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 3.2 3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.19% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 48 19 24 24 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 450 Mixed 293 SusWrite 62.9 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 39.6 4K Write 88.3 4K Mixed 47.3 167% 58.4 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 346 DQ Mixed 185 187% 303 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 108%
Ramsta S800 480GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 159GB free Firmware: RS81V0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 230 255 245 242 253 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 298 Write 295 Mixed 260 SusWrite 248 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 90.3 4K Mixed 43.8 151% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 88.4 114% 203 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 215GB free Firmware: CC47 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 148 154 151 152 152 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 178 Write 136 Mixed 83.1 SusWrite 150 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 112%
Seagate ST3160827AS 160GB-$70 1,727 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 112GB free Firmware: 3.42 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 153 Write 10 Mixed 20.4 SusWrite 33.8 39% 54.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 32%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 113GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 65 64 63 64 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 55.8 Write 52.4 Mixed 41.4 SusWrite 62.9 39% 53.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 44%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0915 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 132 133 134 134 131 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	67.8% Good	Read 102 Write 133 Mixed 101 SusWrite 132 87% 117 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.7 301% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.8% Great: 94%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 24GB free, PID 1010 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 32 32 32 33 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 34.5 Mixed 27.4 SusWrite 30.9 43% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 68% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 1,438 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 960GB free, PID d010 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 142 137 141 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	47.8% Average	Read 82.7 Write 78 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 138 109% 80.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 59%
WD 10EADS External 1TB 3,369 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 486GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 41 41 40 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 37.2 Mixed 32.7 SusWrite 39.7 52% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 21%
SAMSUNG HD103UI 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 43GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 42 41 41 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	24.1% Poor	Read 65.9 Write 22.3 Mixed 39 SusWrite 40.3 52% 41.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	54.8% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 17 54% 19 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 17.5 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	196x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	130x
Core i5-4440Intel $99Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	77x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	41x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	44x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16