Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics10.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '17 at 02:50
Run Duration419 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 153
2-Core 309
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 614
8-Core 856
93% 735 Pts
64-Core 853
53% 853 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 103%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
EVGA(3842 2059) 2GB
CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Lighting 11.8
Reflection 14
Parallax 9.94
10% 11.9 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 16.2
12% 14.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 474
Write 303
Mixed 336
82% 371 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 24.2
91% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 345
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 46.1
94% 194 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 98%
Toshiba HDWN160 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: FS1M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 169
Mixed 159
124% 164 MB/s
4K Read 3.73
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.35
237% 2.12 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 112%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: MPAOA250 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 90.3
Write 84.4
Mixed 83.3
65% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.58
4K Write 1.35
4K Mixed 0.16
67% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 73%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 93.9
Write 81.2
Mixed 77.6
63% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.53
4K Mixed 0.52
135% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 85%
WD Green 2TB (2009)-$113
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 75.7
Write 101
Mixed 75.3
63% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.38
103% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 60%
H/W RAID 5 24TB
11.5TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.6% Good
Read 222
Write 144
Mixed 160
212% 175 MB/s
4K Read 8.49
4K Write 0.34
4K Mixed 0.24
51% 3.02 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%
H/W RAID 5 18TB
6TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
Read 38.1
Write 33.1
Mixed 28.3
41% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.05
4K Mixed 0.03
3% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 41%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
8.02% Terrible
Read 38.1
Write 5.05
Mixed 7.29
15% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.12
20% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.02%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2473 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.3
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 27.1
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,104
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback