Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 03 '22 at 11:06
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7940X-$647
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 73.6
1-Core 115
2-Core 225
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 886
80% 671 Pts
64-Core 2131
132% 2131 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 180
Reflection 196
Parallax 188
147% 188 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 186
Splatting 130
123% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 287 291 238 193 192 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 414
Write 296
Mixed 294
SusWrite 250
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 14.5
64% 19.6 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 61.9
DQ Mixed 81.1
91% 162 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 185 181 185 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 147
Mixed 78.7
SusWrite 183
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 44.7
MC Mixed 26.5
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 8.8
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X299 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 130%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 165%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS MASTER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $1,558
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback