Gateway FX6860

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGateway FX6860  (all builds)
MotherboardGateway FX6860
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 22 '20 at 20:32
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$194
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 157
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 254
32% 245 Pts
64-Core 323
20% 323 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2577 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 143
Parallax 134
107% 136 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 130
Splatting 109
96% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 326
Write 254
Mixed 279
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 53.3
4K Mixed 34.2
110% 37.6 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 193
153% 216 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
HP S700 Pro 1TB-$80
19GB free
Firmware: Q0504B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 22 33 32 20 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 481
Write 53.2
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 38.3
34% 160 MB/s
4K Read 26
4K Write 25.6
4K Mixed 27.9
89% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 23.5
DQ Mixed 38.9
65% 135 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
172GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 72.7
Write 66.5
Mixed 54.5
SusWrite 75.2
50% 67.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDS5C4040ALE630 4TB
133GB free
Firmware: MPAOA3B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 62 63 64 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 84.7
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 63.4
41% 57.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.4
105% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 73%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 114 115 115 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 118
Write 117
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 114
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 87%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 151 155 154 155 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 146
Write 150
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 154
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 100%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
49GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 24.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 11.5
29% 22.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 58%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB
11GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 25
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 11.5
28% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 58%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB
107GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 33 25 15 13 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Read 117
Write 56
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 32.1
80% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.3
90% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 36%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
15GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 7.4 7.1 7.1 7 7.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Read 23.2
Write 8.8
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 7
13% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL9 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.8% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FX6860 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Gateway FX6860

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $288
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback