Asus P8B75-V

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8B75-V (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 15 '22 at 12:23
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	66.2% Good	Memory 84.8 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 178 68% 117 Pts	4-Core 280 8-Core 265 37% 272 Pts	64-Core 275 17% 275 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 8436) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 6.3 Parallax 2 4% 4.27 fps	MRender 6.2 Gravity 5 Splatting 3.8 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$62 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 379GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 339 336 369 373 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Read 397 Write 368 Mixed 274 SusWrite 343 78% 345 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 33.2 117% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35.5 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 47.1 44% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 130%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 852GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 109 115 114 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Read 142 Write 131 Mixed 81.2 SusWrite 113 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.9 189% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 85%
WDC WD10 EAVS-22D7B0 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 292GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 41 41 41 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 53.1 Write 34.4 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 39.9 49% 38.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-559.A00LF 16GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	51.5% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.3 51% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 72.2 55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8B75-V Builds (Compare 1,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-V

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	223x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	149x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	88x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	88x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	67x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	58x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	39x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	28x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	21x
1600 CL9 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 55%, 7,092 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $442

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16