TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME H610M-E D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H610M-E D4  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 06:16
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$130
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 62.4
1-Core 172
2-Core 344
99% 193 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 944
98% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,129
70% 1,129 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 90.6%
 Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
6.4% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 13
Parallax 7.9
5% 9.1 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 9.7
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.4%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
875GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1959 1984 1762 1843 1936 2086 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 1,698
Write 2,097
Mixed 1,535
SusWrite 1,928
410% 1,815 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 72.9
246% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,650
DQ Write 1,264
DQ Mixed 1,252
992% 1,388 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑
This bench: 327%
 Great: 365%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98
63GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 191 82 83 82 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 470
Mixed 401
SusWrite 166
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 50.8
175% 65.3 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 336
253% 339 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 99.3%
 Great: 121%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
429GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 128 126 126 130 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 121
Write 124
Mixed 80.1
SusWrite 128
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 71.6%
 Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD4BGUA8C-32N220A 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 47.7%
 Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME H610M-E D4 Builds (Compare 2,670 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H610M-E D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel  $120Bench 98%, 48,886 samples975x
Core i3-12100FIntel  $85Bench 94%, 11,860 samples505x
Core i5-12400Intel  $130Bench 98%, 17,352 samples473x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples358x
UHD Graphics 730IntelBench 6%, 14,644 samples221x
RTX 3050Nvidia  $250Bench 75%, 43,922 samples171x
SSD
SNV2S1000G 1TBKingstonBench 260%, 75,739 samples103x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples83x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 217%, 23,579 samples71x
RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples156x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples150x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples88x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback