MSI MAG Z590 TORPEDO (MS-7D08)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics11.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D08
MotherboardMSI MAG Z590 TORPEDO (MS-7D08)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 09 '23 at 15:19
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Memory 85
1-Core 152
2-Core 301
97% 179 Pts
4-Core 584
8-Core 887
91% 736 Pts
64-Core 1078
67% 1078 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 11E6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 9.3
Parallax 13.7
12% 12.7 fps
MRender 5.4
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 14.9
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$36
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103L0L Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1383
Write 1,178
Mixed 917
258% 1,159 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 28.2
223% 97.7 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 989
DQ Mixed 331
352% 560 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 228%
Generic Flash Disk 64GB
23GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.1
Write 20.6
Mixed 23.4
30% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
59% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Essencore Limited KD4BGUA8C-32N220A 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.5
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG Z590 TORPEDO (MS-7D08) Builds (Compare 2,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 131%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG Z590 TORPEDO (MS-7D08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $681
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback