Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6500ZE_K6500ZE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive216% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6500ZE_K6500ZE  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6500ZE
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 03:03
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12650H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
75% Very good
Memory 56.2
1-Core 169
2-Core 340
96% 188 Pts
4-Core 503
8-Core 796
80% 649 Pts
64-Core 1,206
75% 1,206 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 75%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)
Asus(1043 10D3) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54.2% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 64.1
57% 68.4 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 56.2
49% 61.1 fps
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 72%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
363GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1266 1014 684 275 380 230 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,724
Write 1386
Mixed 1115
SusWrite 642
272% 1,217 MB/s
4K Read 63
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 83.6
282% 99.2 MB/s
DQ Read 426
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 399
316% 436 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 216%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 48.1
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 47.8
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 25.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 124%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6500ZE_K6500ZE Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6500ZE_K6500ZE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback