MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '22 at 09:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 95.8
2-Core 190
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 377
43% 336 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.66% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 0.7
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.9
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 16 31 31 37 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.8% Very poor
Read 79
Write 98
Mixed 82.7
SusWrite 50.9
18% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 8.4
36% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 16
DQ Mixed 12.8
10% 13.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 102%
MD06400-BQDW-RO 640GB
191GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 85 84 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 82
Write 85.2
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 83.6
57% 77.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
E07F OSCOO DDR4 2666 4G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.6% Good
MC Read 23
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 19.7
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback