PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	6.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	56.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '22 at 06:49
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2 214 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	47.9% Average	Memory 50 1-Core 64 2-Core 127 46% 80.3 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 464 42% 355 Pts	64-Core 1,268 78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.13% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 6.7 6% 8.27 fps	MRender 9.5 Gravity 8.2 Splatting 7.1 7% 8.27 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.13% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM84 128GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4D0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 81 91 110 93 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 386 Write 137 Mixed 146 SusWrite 83.9 41% 188 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 48.7 4K Mixed 25.2 96% 33 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 79 DQ Mixed 66.6 71% 122 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 95%
Toshiba THNSNJ12 128GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 62GB free Firmware: 0103 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 83 98 86 90 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 423 Write 395 Mixed 376 SusWrite 101 72% 324 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 57.6 4K Mixed 32.5 105% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 211 DQ Write 99.1 DQ Mixed 148 112% 153 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M393B5170GB0-CH 4x4GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4 of 12 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	25.9% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 8.7 27% 9.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 5.2 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 161 25% 161 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 73%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z9PR-D12 Series Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Raft

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

System: PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v21stBench 55%, 214 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia $88Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	5x
GTX 780-TiNvidia $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples	3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x
THNSNJ12 128GBToshibaBench 72%, 51 samples	2x
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK1T0MBF 1TBBench 84%, 1,769 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ81RF4BCFP-DJ 12x8GBElpidaBench 93%, 10 samples	5x
36JSZF51272PZ1G 8x4GBMicronBench 84%, 9 samples	2x
M393B5170EH1-CH 8x4GBSamsungBench 75%, 10 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $164

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16