TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPSSC Z9PR-D12 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 07:33
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 64
2-Core 124
54% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 245
8-Core 462
42% 354 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 60.6%
 Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 747 MHz, MLim: 703 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 378.92
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNJ12 128GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 137 194 284 396 246 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
65% Good
Read 311
Write 103
Mixed 201
SusWrite 226
47% 210 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 32
102% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 274
171% 192 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑
This bench: 65%
 Great: 99%
Samsung SM84 128GB
13GB free
Firmware: 4D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 92 33 41 43 43 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53% Above average
Read 267
Write 106
Mixed 138
SusWrite 74.8
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 22.2
93% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 74.4
DQ Mixed 81.8
94% 170 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 53%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5170GB0-CH 4x4GB
4 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.1% Very good
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 25.6
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 5.7
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 73.1%
 Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z9PR-D12 Series Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples6x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v21stBench 55%, 214 samples3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples3x
GPU
GTX 1050Nvidia  $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples5x
GTX 780-TiNvidia  $410Bench 53%, 30,815 samples3x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples2x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples4x
THNSNJ12 128GBToshibaBench 72%, 51 samples2x
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK1T0MBF 1TBBench 84%, 1,769 samples2x
RAM
EBJ81RF4BCFP-DJ 12x8GBElpidaBench 93%, 10 samples5x
36JSZF51272PZ1G 8x4GBMicronBench 84%, 9 samples2x
M393B5170EH1-CH 8x4GBSamsungBench 75%, 10 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback