PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive37.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemPSSC Z9PR-D12 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PR-D12 Series
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '22 at 07:01
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 49.2
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 107
43% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 491
43% 367 Pts
64-Core 1,272
79% 1,272 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 737 MHz, MLim: 663 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM84 128GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 33 39 36 39 34 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.2% Below average
Read 156
Write 104
Mixed 115
SusWrite 39.7
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 52.2
4K Mixed 16.6
74% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 70.7
DQ Mixed 73.8
73% 120 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 95%
Toshiba THNSNJ12 128GB
62GB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 86 86 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.7% Above average
Read 255
Write 155
Mixed 244
SusWrite 94.7
42% 187 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 43.7
4K Mixed 31.4
92% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 90.4
DQ Mixed 140
110% 157 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M393B5170GB0-CH 4x4GB
4 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.3% Poor
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 8.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 3.3
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 164
24% 164 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z9PR-D12 Series Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: PSSC Z9PR-D12 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $181
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback