Asus P8Z77-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 10 '22 at 22:01
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$30
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 200
76% 130 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 386
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 78%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 84CA) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.9
3% 2.97 fps
MRender 5.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 5
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 372 115 190 87 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 442
Write 412
Mixed 391
SusWrite 206
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 1.1
75% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 56.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
28% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
779GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 114 117 109 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 61.3
Write 97.1
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 112
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 8502 1600 CL10 Series 8502 1600 CL10 Series 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 18.5
60% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.2
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-M PRO Builds (Compare 744 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M PRO - $360

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback