HP ProBook 640 G1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ProBook 640 G1  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1993
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160926
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 01 '22 at 19:16
Run Duration370 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 83.3
2-Core 139
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 221
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 220
14% 220 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1993) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 5.7
3% 3.83 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 120 113 106 95 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 454
Write 412
Mixed 356
SusWrite 125
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 43.5
145% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 228
197% 290 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 118%
ST320LT0 12-1DG14C 320GB
146GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 83 84 83 82 81 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 84.8
Mixed 49
SusWrite 83.5
101% 75.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance SODIM DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 13.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 640 G1 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 640 G1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $292
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback