Asus X450CC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus X450CC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450CC
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '20 at 05:20
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 83.8
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 117
57% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 177
8-Core 176
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 173
11% 173 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 126D) 2.5GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2932
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.55% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 2.78
3% 3.85 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.22
4% 4.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
756GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 37 25 37 48 61 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 77.2
Write 99.6
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 39.6
49% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%
ST320LT0 12-1DG14C 320GB
175GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 23 24 24 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 29.2
Write 22
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 23.7
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6E1 Elpida 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 14.5
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X450CC Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450CC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback